data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df4e/9df4eef430ab89972f48bb49b6bc4877c42f94a3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cebb0/cebb0091b7eba55f11cda2991257d81f940e9005" alt=""
And this on top of the National Review cover of Sotomayor as Buddha. What? There aren't any images of wise Latinas to make fun of, so you have to expropriate an Asian image? Even when the person you're mocking isn't Asian?!
Get a clue. Justice Sonya Sotomayor is NOT Asian. What is it about her that makes magazine-cover designers think Asian? And then we can't even decide what variety of Asian we're mis-identifying her as. Kabuki? Japanese. Buddha? Indian/Chinese. No matter, she is NOT Asian!
Seems like Frank Wu got it right in his book, Yellow: Race in America Beyond Black and White, once we move off the black/white dichotomy we are clueless about race.
5 comments:
you make a very valid point! thanks for making us think :-)
Irritating!
btw--so recommend Wu's book.
I thought the very same thing when the ABA Journal came across my desk,...what the heck??? Frankly I was too snowed under to read it yet.
Does anybody know what "kabuki confirmation" actually means?
Wow, that's so disturbing on so many levels!
Post a Comment